-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Fix a panic in the capacity plugin caused by uninitialized realCapability fields in newQueueAttr`
#4611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dafu-wu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a stability issue within the scheduler's capacity plugin. By ensuring that a specific resource capability field is properly initialized, it prevents application crashes that could occur due to unhandled null values during resource cloning operations, thereby enhancing the robustness of the queue management system.
Highlights
- Bug Fix: Nil Pointer Dereference: This PR resolves a critical bug where the realCapability field in newQueueAttr was not initialized, leading to potential runtime panics (nil pointer dereference) when queueAttr.Clone() was called, especially with hierarchical queues and inconsistent resource specifications.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a critical bug that could cause a panic due to a nil pointer dereference in the capacity plugin. The fix involves initializing the realCapability field within the newQueueAttr function, which is the correct approach to prevent queueAttr.Clone() from failing when hierarchical queue validation does not complete successfully. The change is clean, effective, and also improves code formatting by aligning struct fields. This is a good fix.
fields in newQueueAttr`
Add missing initialization for realCapability field in the newQueueAttr function to prevent potential nil pointer issues. Signed-off-by: dafu <[email protected]>
|
@Monokaix can you help review it when you are available? |
|
Hello, 🔗 PR: volcano-sh/volcano#4558 Given the impact, this should be prioritzed I think as soon as possible. |
What type of PR is this?
/bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR initializes the
realCapabilityfields in thenewQueueAttrfunction.Without this initialization, these fields could remain
nil, leading to runtime panics (e.g., nil pointer dereference inqueueAttr.Clone()when thecapacityplugin handles queue resources).Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
queueAttr.Clone()to dereference anilResource.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?