Skip to content

Conversation

@rockburning
Copy link

fix panic when clone when real capacity is nil
img_v3_02pa_fd71a9dc-22d5-411a-8702-e8310637f51g

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @rockburning!

It looks like this is your first PR to volcano-sh/volcano.

Thank you, and welcome to Volcano. 😃

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign thor-wl
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @thor-wl in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @rockburning, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical panic that occurs when the realCapacity field of capacity plugins is nil during a cloning operation. The fix ensures that realCapability is always initialized to an empty resource, thereby preventing the panic and improving the stability of the capacity plugin.

Highlights

  • Panic Fix: Addressed a panic condition in the capacityPlugin by initializing the realCapability field within the newQueueAttr function. Previously, this field could be nil, leading to a panic during cloning operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 20, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a critical panic that could occur within the capacity scheduling plugin. The panic was caused by a nil pointer dereference when cloning a queueAttr struct, specifically when the realCapability field was nil. The fix involves initializing realCapability to an empty resource within the newQueueAttr function, ensuring it is always non-nil. This change is correct and effectively prevents the panic, improving the stability of the scheduler, particularly in hierarchical queue configurations.

@JesseStutler
Copy link
Member

What's the root cause? Can you provide more details on the issue background? Why does initializing a realCapability solve it?

@rockburning
Copy link
Author

What's the root cause? Can you provide more details on the issue background? Why does initializing a realCapability solve it?

you can see from the picture,it will clone panic when realCapability is nil,it will access the member of the struct. type Resource struct {
MilliCPU float64
Memory float64

// ScalarResources
ScalarResources map[v1.ResourceName]float64

// MaxTaskNum is only used by predicates; it should NOT
// be accounted in other operators, e.g. Add.
MaxTaskNum int

},to avoid this, so i initialize realCapability with empty resource

@JesseStutler
Copy link
Member

We need to confirm the triggering scenario more precisely, is it a hierarchical queue or a non-hierarchical queue scenario? Regardless of whether the hierarchical queue is enabled or not, realCapability is now assigned a value instead of nil, so we need to know the actual root cause

@rockburning
Copy link
Author

rockburning commented Aug 27, 2025 via email

@JesseStutler
Copy link
Member

Strange thing is that:

realCapability := api.ExceededPart(attr.realCapability, totalGuarantee).Add(childAttr.guarantee)
if childAttr.capability == nil {
childAttr.capability = api.EmptyResource()
childAttr.realCapability = realCapability
} else {
realCapability.MinDimensionResource(childAttr.capability, api.Infinity)
childAttr.realCapability = realCapability
If we opened hierarchical queues, all queues' realCapability can be successfully initialized, so why still cause panic?

Which version of volcano did you use?

@rockburning
Copy link
Author

rockburning commented Aug 29, 2025 via email

@hajnalmt
Copy link
Contributor

This has the DCO not signed.
Let's close it as a duplicate of #4611 and merge the other one I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants