Skip to content

Conversation

stbischof
Copy link

  • jboss-parent from 16 to 39
  • rm maven-enforcer-plugin with
  • requireMavenVersion >2.2.0
  • requireJavaVersion 1.5.0
  • rm java5 surefire test
  • fix checkstyle in code and xml
  • add dependabot
  • add ci build

- jboss-parent from 16 to 39
- rm maven-enforcer-plugin with
 - requireMavenVersion >2.2.0
 - requireJavaVersion 1.5.0
- rm java5 surefire test
- fix checkstyle in code and xml
- add dependabot
- add ci build
@stbischof
Copy link
Author

<version>1.6.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indentation seems a bit off, can you fix it @stbischof ?

</dependency>

<!-- Testing -->
<!-- Testing -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same indentation problem here

*/
public interface Filter {
boolean filter(final Metadata metadata, final TreeWalker walker);
boolean filter(Metadata metadata, TreeWalker walker);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd probably keep this PR related to updating JDK and poms, code changes could be in a different PR

* If the name is not specified
*/
public Pattern(final String name) throws IllegalArgumentException {
Pattern(final String name) throws IllegalArgumentException {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same thing, let's keep this PR focused on JDK and poms


on:
push:
branches: [ "2.0.0-X" ]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that 2.0.0-X was renamed this should be "main"

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@9bb56186c3b09b4f86b1c65136769dd318469633 # v4.1.2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First time I see this, any preference over using the standard @v4?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the version on its commit hash. @4 is Always the latest of 4
Makes a reproducable build.
Is recommend from some open source Security observers.

Dependabot can handle the Updates also.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, fine by me. Feel free to have a look at the rest of the comments and we can get this merged 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants