-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
test(controller): improve code coverage #5816
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(controller): improve code coverage #5816
Conversation
…5150) Signed-off-by: Tobias Harnickell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Harnickell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Harnickell <[email protected]>
…5150) Signed-off-by: Tobias Harnickell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Harnickell <[email protected]>
Hi @TobyTheHutt. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm |
Looks like you have an experience with flags and how to test CLI. There is an issue #5379, which may require multiple PRs, if you want you could try help us migrate |
I'll give it a look. It seems to me that's quire some work and I don't think I could take responsibility over the whole thing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mloiseleur The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What does it do ?
Improves test coverage on the controller.
Motivation
The referenced ticket (#5150), aiming to improve code coverage.
The changes in #5798 should be reviewed separately from the basic checks I also implemented, which is why I propose to merge the "safe" changes first.
More