Skip to content

Add workflow for Pull Request review automation #187

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+24 −0
Open

Add workflow for Pull Request review automation #187

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/augment-review-pr.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
name: Pull Request Review

on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, ready_for_review]

permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write

jobs:
review-pr:
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot Aug 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a timeout to prevent the job from running indefinitely:

Suggested change
review-pr:
review-pr:
name: Pull Request Review
timeout-minutes: 10

This helps prevent resource waste if the action encounters issues and provides a clear failure point.

name: Pull Request Review
runs-on:
- ubuntu-latest
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot Aug 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using the string format for runs-on to match the pattern used in other workflows in this repository:

Suggested change
- ubuntu-latest
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

This is more consistent with the format used in pre-commit.yml and is the more common convention.

if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name && github.event.pull_request.draft == false
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot Aug 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider breaking down this complex conditional for better readability:

Suggested change
if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name && github.event.pull_request.draft == false
if: |
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name &&
github.event.pull_request.draft == false

This multi-line format makes the conditions easier to read and understand.

steps:
- name: Generate PR Review
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot Aug 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider pinning to a specific version or commit SHA instead of using @v0 for better security and reproducibility:

Suggested change
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0.1.0

Mutable tags like @v0 can change unexpectedly and pose security risks. Using a specific version or commit SHA ensures consistent behavior.

with:
augment_session_auth: ${{ secrets.AUGMENT_SESSION_AUTH }}
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
pull_number: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
repo_name: ${{ github.repository }}