Skip to content

Conversation

@g1331
Copy link
Owner

@g1331 g1331 commented Aug 29, 2025

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 29, 2025 03:58
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automate pull request reviews using the Augment Code service. The workflow triggers on PR events and uses an external action to generate automated code reviews.

  • Adds automated PR review workflow that triggers on opened and ready_for_review events
  • Configures permissions for reading repository contents and writing PR comments
  • Integrates with augmentcode/review-pr action using authentication secrets

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Workflow configuration looks good overall. I've identified a few improvements for consistency, security, and best practices.

review-pr:
name: Pull Request Review
runs-on:
- ubuntu-latest

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using the string format for runs-on to match the pattern used in other workflows in this repository:

Suggested change
- ubuntu-latest
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

This is more consistent with the format used in pre-commit.yml and is the more common convention.

if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name && github.event.pull_request.draft == false
steps:
- name: Generate PR Review
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider pinning to a specific version or commit SHA instead of using @v0 for better security and reproducibility:

Suggested change
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0
uses: augmentcode/review-pr@v0.1.0

Mutable tags like @v0 can change unexpectedly and pose security risks. Using a specific version or commit SHA ensures consistent behavior.

name: Pull Request Review
runs-on:
- ubuntu-latest
if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name && github.event.pull_request.draft == false

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider breaking down this complex conditional for better readability:

Suggested change
if: github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name && github.event.pull_request.draft == false
if: |
github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.event.pull_request.base.repo.full_name &&
github.event.pull_request.draft == false

This multi-line format makes the conditions easier to read and understand.

pull-requests: write

jobs:
review-pr:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a timeout to prevent the job from running indefinitely:

Suggested change
review-pr:
review-pr:
name: Pull Request Review
timeout-minutes: 10

This helps prevent resource waste if the action encounters issues and provides a clear failure point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants