Skip to content

Choreo accuracy & improved mobility autos #70

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TheFlameFish
Copy link
Contributor

@TheFlameFish TheFlameFish commented Mar 30, 2025

Give Choreo real robot numbers, lengthen mobility autos as requested by strategy, minor refactor of choreo trajectories, and use exclusively PID for driver assist

TODO:

  • Test on Dory
  • Test on Nautilus

* terminate the command.
* @return A command to drive to the target pose, terminating once at acceptable error.
*/
public static Command simpleGoToPoint(Drive drive, Pose2d target) {
Copy link
Contributor

@nolanhergert nolanhergert Mar 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From how far away did you test this PID-only pathing, and what did it behave like? It seems like it was good, or else you wouldn't recommend it. I can watch tomorrow too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested from about 2.7178 m and 180 degrees. Seems decently smooth, although a bit slow

Copy link
Contributor

@nolanhergert nolanhergert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine. I would like to see the dynamic pathing myself and a quick test of the new mobility paths.

Ace5tar
Ace5tar previously approved these changes Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Ace5tar Ace5tar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

assuming that you have the testing to back it up, which im pretty sure you do, this looks like an improvement to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants