OCM-18684 | fix: Remove proxy's special characters value to avoid mee…

[yasun1]

…ting invalid value error

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @yasun1, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where proxy authentication in test environments could fail due to the presence of special characters in the automatically generated passwords. By modifying the password generation logic to exclusively use alphanumeric characters, the change ensures robust and error-free proxy setup within the testing framework.

Highlights

• Proxy Password Generation: The method for generating proxy authentication passwords in tests has been updated to ensure only alphanumeric characters are used.
• Error Prevention: This change specifically addresses and prevents 'invalid value error' that could occur when special characters were present in the proxy password during test setup.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[yasun1]

@gemini-cli review the change

[yasun1]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request addresses an issue with proxy authentication by ensuring the generated password contains only alphanumeric characters, preventing an 'invalid value' error. The change is correct and well-targeted. I have one minor suggestion to improve code readability by replacing the magic number for password length with a constant.

[gemini-code-assist]

To improve readability and maintainability, it's better to define the password length as a constant instead of using a magic number 10.

Suggested change

	password := helper.GenerateRandomString(10)
	const proxyPasswordLength = 10
	password := helper.GenerateRandomString(proxyPasswordLength)

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue with special characters in the proxy password by generating an alphanumeric password instead. The approach is sound; however, the implementation introduces a call to helper.GenerateRandomString, a function that appears to be undefined based on the provided codebase. This will cause a compilation failure and must be addressed. I've also included a minor suggestion to improve the accuracy of a code comment.

[gemini-code-assist]

This change introduces a call to helper.GenerateRandomString, but this function does not appear to be defined in the tests/utils/helper package based on the files provided. This will cause a compilation error. Please ensure this function is defined and included in the pull request.

Additionally, the comment is slightly inaccurate. It says // Remove all special characters..., but the code is generating a new string, not modifying an existing one. A more accurate comment would be // Generate a password containing only alphanumeric characters..

Suggested change

	// Remove all special characters, keep only alphanumeric characters
	password := helper.GenerateRandomString(10)
	// Generate a password containing only alphanumeric characters.
	password := helper.GenerateRandomString(10)