Skip to content

Conversation

dwd
Copy link
Contributor

@dwd dwd commented Dec 15, 2024

  • Surface (and correct) the source control information.
  • Surface the publication URL (although I assume anyone reading this has figured that one out by now).
  • Surface the contributor side of things.
  • Add bit about XEP authors making PRs if they don't exist - this is "new" rather than documenting existing practice.
  • Add bit about PRs getting XEP author approval (existing practice hithertofore undocumented).
  • Add bit about Council (etc) adding authors if they drop off (existing practice hithertofore undocumented).
  • Add note to clarify that Retraction doesn't mean Deletion (existing practice, documented, but has been misunderstood before).

@dwd dwd changed the title Authors and Contributions XEP-0001 Authors and Contributions Dec 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Needs Board The affected XEP has the Board as Approving Body and it needs to decide on the change. label Dec 24, 2024
@Neustradamus
Copy link

@dwd: It is possible to add a part to have a good timeline?

"Published date" and "Update date" are date of publication not the date of a commit.

Thanks in advance.

@dwd dwd marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 08:04
@Neustradamus
Copy link

@dwd: Can you look my previous comment?

Thanks in advance.

@dwd
Copy link
Contributor Author

dwd commented Aug 13, 2025

@dwd: It is possible to add a part to have a good timeline?

"Published date" and "Update date" are date of publication not the date of a commit.

Thanks in advance.

You're asking if we can change the process to include these? I don't want to change the process at all with this (and related) changes, just document what we actually do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Board The affected XEP has the Board as Approving Body and it needs to decide on the change.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants