Skip to content

Conversation

sadilchamishka
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes in this pull request

$subject

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 5, 2025 08:52
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the token update success tracking logic in the invalidateAndCreateNewAccessToken method by removing the tokenUpdateSuccessful variable and replacing its condition with isTokenCleanupFeatureEnabled.

  • Removes unnecessary tokenUpdateSuccessful boolean variable and its assignment
  • Changes the post-refresh token event condition to depend on isTokenCleanupFeatureEnabled instead of update success status

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

IdentityDatabaseUtil.closeConnection(connection);
}
if (tokenUpdateSuccessful) {
if (isTokenCleanupFeatureEnabled) {
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Sep 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The condition has changed from checking if the token update was successful to checking if cleanup is enabled. This could cause post-refresh events to fire even when the database transaction failed and was rolled back, leading to inconsistent state.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 57.81%. Comparing base (5d1ea6c) to head (97b9129).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...carbon/identity/oauth2/dao/AccessTokenDAOImpl.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             master    #2897    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage     57.80%   57.81%            
+ Complexity     9034     8996    -38     
==========================================
  Files           669      669            
  Lines         50275    50168   -107     
  Branches      10990    10974    -16     
==========================================
- Hits          29062    29005    -57     
+ Misses        17172    17129    -43     
+ Partials       4041     4034     -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 40.14% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant