-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
[sub pr: #100] Rename classes & refactor fork token handling flow #101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: NewFlowChanges
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
""" | ||
|
||
def has_permission(self, request, view): | ||
auth_header = request.headers.get("Authorization") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I imagine you didn't like the X-Character-Token
header. I think it was good to keep them separated and so we always know what we are talking about
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe only a minor thing however there's reasons not to put secrets in headers other than Authorization: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43164958/3934270
…s not exist on a request
tested as working from Postman |
Attempts to follow most of the review feedback given aswell.