Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2022. It is now read-only.

build for 2.13.0-M5 #223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2019
Merged

build for 2.13.0-M5 #223

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2019

Conversation

larsrh
Copy link
Contributor

@larsrh larsrh commented Jan 30, 2019

  • simplify build (depend on cats-testkit directly, simplify dependencies)
  • drop 2.10.x build (dropped by cats)
  • bump dependencies

MiMa fails the check against 0.6.0, but succeeds against 1.0.0. So, if nobody complains, I'd call the next release with this PR merged 1.0.1.

- simplify build (depend on cats-testkit directly, simplify dependencies)
- drop 2.10.x build (dropped by cats)
- bump dependencies
@larsrh larsrh requested a review from johnynek January 30, 2019 09:43
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 30, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #223 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #223   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    76.4%   76.4%           
======================================
  Files          42      42           
  Lines         958     958           
  Branches       68      45   -23     
======================================
  Hits          732     732           
  Misses        226     226

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27b2ce4...3dec9e6. Read the comment docs.

@erikerlandson
Copy link

my understanding was that this entire project was going to be moved into a new cats-algebra subpackage

@larsrh
Copy link
Contributor Author

larsrh commented Jan 30, 2019

Apparently that's typelevel/cats#2041. Still, I'd like to get a 2.13.0-M5 compatible release out. Who knows when the merge is going to happen.

@erikerlandson
Copy link

I tried this via #221, but either way, could also make use of a 2.13 build

@larsrh
Copy link
Contributor Author

larsrh commented Jan 30, 2019

I didn't see that PR, unfortunately ☹️

@erikerlandson
Copy link

this appears to not change any signatures. if that is preferable and gets it merged, so much the better

@johnynek johnynek merged commit 59354d5 into typelevel:master Jan 30, 2019
@larsrh larsrh deleted the topic/2.13.0-M5 branch January 30, 2019 19:39
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants