Add direct-relative assembly mnemonics with a numeric displacement. #22
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This feature request introduces a possibility to use a numeric displacement in a direct-relative addressing mode.
Previously, we could only use labels with direct-relative addressing mode in assembly, like
JUMP L_NAME. But it wasn't really convenient to add new labels just to implement simple two-lines loop or jump a few lines.Alternative way of defining direct-relative mnemonics
JUMP (IP+5)was shown in a bcomp manual, so I decided to implement it.Now, this mode supports both label reference and numeric displacement mnemonics.
Also, I wrote tests that cover conversions of assembly to instructions for all addressing modes.