-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 17
rethink parser #101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rethink parser #101
Conversation
Benchmark Results
Benchmark PlotsA plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #101 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.09% 87.74% +1.64%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 10172 10618 +446
==========================================
+ Hits 8758 9317 +559
+ Misses 1414 1301 -113 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
… useful for later, so keep it
…lling.jl into rethink_parser
* Add test for parsing if statements inside for loops * more conditions added * Handle nested loops with conditionals * test script * intermediate version if else elseif * works on normal case * minor update on nothin condition * complete if parsing * fix if parsing * type stable remove_nothing * add test backus with for and if * type stability rm for remove_nothing * fix types on remove nothing... * Delete benchmark/Backus_Kehoe_Kydland_1992.jl * Delete benchmark/test_if_else.jl * Delete test/if_for_loop_test.jl * Delete test/mini_parser.jl * no dipatch doctor on contains_equation * no dispatch doctor on the if expr parsing related codes
No description provided.