Skip to content

Conversation

@bangelic
Copy link
Contributor

@bangelic bangelic commented Sep 23, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

Updates the instructions to upgrade 'in-place' for disconnected environments.
Related to closed PR #3770 but only addresses Updating a disconnected {ProjectServer} on {EL} 9

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-24752

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Sep 23, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 23, 2025

The PR preview for c98f1dd is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4293.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to see a tech review first if you don't mind.

@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author and removed Not yet reviewed labels Oct 2, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@parthaa parthaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@parthaa parthaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes that lena suggested look good :)

@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Oct 14, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka changed the title Update instructions in Updating doc Use ISS export sync for Updating Oct 15, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Oct 15, 2025
@parthaa
Copy link
Contributor

parthaa commented Oct 15, 2025

I tested this upgrading a new 6.17.3 -> 6.17.5 sat with the syncable export => ACK

@Lennonka Lennonka added testing done No issues from the functional perspective and removed Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Oct 15, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka changed the title Use ISS export sync for Updating Use ISS export sync for disconnected Updating Oct 16, 2025

.Additional resources
* To restore the backup of the {ProjectServer} or {SmartProxyServer}, see {AdministeringDocURL}Restoring_from_a_Full_Backup_admin[Restoring {ProjectServer} or {SmartProxyServer} from a Backup].
* To restore a backup of the {ProjectServer} or {SmartProxyServer}, see {AdministeringDocURL}Restoring_from_a_Full_Backup_admin[Restoring {ProjectServer} or {SmartProxyServer} from a Backup].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will cause us problems in DITA-fication later, right? Additional resources must contain only links, not text.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but it's out of scope for this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nevermind, I've cleaned it up. There was a whitespace change on that line anyway.

@pr-processor pr-processor bot added the Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author label Oct 17, 2025
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Oct 20, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka requested a review from jafiala October 20, 2025 00:41
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <[email protected]>
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb Thank you for your suggestions! Final ack, please?

@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

Damn, conflicts. I'll have to rebase in a fresh PR. Wait for it, please.

@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #4438

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective testing done No issues from the functional perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants