-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
fix: generate header after query also in do_describe_ in DuckDB example #272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AlphaJack
wants to merge
2
commits into
sunng87:master
Choose a base branch
from
AlphaJack:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, we cannot execute it on the describe command, if the query has side-effects, this will break the system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An alternative is to use DuckDB DESCRIBE for queries that return results:
What are the two do_describe_() expected to return for DDL queries? Because DESCRIBE doesn't support them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It returns a
NoDatamessage in postgres wire protocol.This approach looks good. Do you know if there is a duckdb API for this? It feels like it should be something like
describeonStatement. This is what I expected column_type and column_name should return.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems duckdb does have this capability to get column structure for a statement without running it, but at least duckdb-rs didn't expose this capability as statement API. It would be nice to add it so we can call column_type/column_name either after query or after describe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where could you read that DuckDB can retrieve the column structure for a statement without running it?
In the C API, it seems that
duckdb_column_count()and other functions still need aduckdb_resultpointer generated byduckdb_query()(doc PDF page 54, doc website).On the other hand, using DESCRIBE would mean having a new map for type string to FieldInfo datatype
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't read from their API. It's just because they are capable with this
DESCRIBEstatement that returns column structures without executing the statement, which in theory can be implemented as an API.I agree using DESCRIBE in this scenario can be a little tricky.
duckdb-rshas aTypeenumeration but we will need to translate it into arrow types then to postgres types.By the way, I'm going to ask upstream if it's possible to add
describeAPI to statement.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feature request thread in duckdb: duckdb/duckdb#17951