Skip to content

Conversation

asifebrahim
Copy link

@asifebrahim asifebrahim commented Aug 19, 2025

Made the necessary changes with a test file

Closes 35343

Signed-off-by: Asif Ebrahim [email protected]

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Aug 19, 2025
sdeleuze and others added 3 commits August 19, 2025 22:37
This commit also includes related refinements of
JdbcTemplate#getSingleColumnRowMapper and
ObjectUtils#addObjectToArray.

Closes spring-projectsgh-35340
@asifebrahim asifebrahim reopened this Aug 19, 2025
@bclozel bclozel added status: invalid An issue that we don't feel is valid and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Aug 19, 2025
@sdeleuze
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @asifebrahim, I am not sure to understand why you closed this PR which seems to fix #35343 before we had a chance to review it. Could you explain?

@asifebrahim
Copy link
Author

i thought someone else was assigned to it so that's why..I'll reopen

@asifebrahim asifebrahim reopened this Aug 20, 2025
return super.supports(returnType, converterType) && returnType.hasMethodAnnotation(JsonView.class);
return super.supports(returnType, converterType) &&
(returnType.hasMethodAnnotation(JsonView.class) ||
returnType.getDeclaringClass().isAnnotationPresent(JsonView.class));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should @JsonView on super type be considered?

@sdeleuze sdeleuze added in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: invalid An issue that we don't feel is valid labels Aug 21, 2025
@sdeleuze sdeleuze self-assigned this Aug 21, 2025
@sdeleuze sdeleuze added this to the 7.0.0-M9 milestone Aug 21, 2025
@sdeleuze
Copy link
Contributor

sdeleuze commented Sep 9, 2025

After more thoughts and discussion with the team, we prefer to decline this feature originally proposed in #35343 because the @JsonView class attribute is strongly related to the return type of the method, so specifying that at class level looks confusing from a programming model perspective.

@sdeleuze sdeleuze closed this Sep 9, 2025
@sdeleuze sdeleuze removed this from the 7.0.0-M9 milestone Sep 9, 2025
@sdeleuze sdeleuze added the status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply label Sep 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants