secret_blizzard #3644
Open
secret_blizzard #3644
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nasbench
requested changes
Aug 25, 2025
detections/endpoint/windows_certutil_certificate_addition_in_temp_path.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Comment on lines
+11
to
+13
| search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime values(Processes.process) | ||
| as process max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes | ||
| where `process_certutil` Processes.process=*-addstore* Processes.process=*root* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is also covered by Attempt To Add Certificate To Untrusted Store. If you say that the store name root is unique and must be monitored then you can add this analytic but you have to take care of the description and explaining why it is important to monitor it.
detections/endpoint/windows_firewallapi_dll_load_from_unusual_path.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Comment on lines
+11
to
+12
| search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry | ||
| WHERE (Registry.registry_value_name= "Category" Registry.registry_path = "*\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\NetworkList\\Profiles*") Registry.registry_value_data = 0x00000000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we know if the adversary used reg or PowerShell in this case? Because perhaps the default behavior of this is that svchost make that change but an attacker might use a tool.
Of course a GUI could still be used but just thinking out loud to try and make this more accurate.
Perhaps a VT search for this registry change would bring good results.
Co-authored-by: Nasreddine Bencherchali <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New
analytic story
What does this PR have in it? Screenshots are worth 1000 words 😄
Checklist
<platform>_<mitre att&ck technique>_<short description>nomenclatureNotes For Submitters and Reviewers
buildCI job when it fails will likely show an error about what is failing. You may have a very descriptive error of the specific field(s) in the specific file(s) that is causing an issue. In some cases, its also possible there is an issue with the YAML. Many of these can be caught with the pre-commit hooks if you set them up. These errors will be less descriptive as to what exactly is wrong, but will give you a column and row position in a specific file where the YAML processing breaks. If you're having trouble with this, feel free to add a comment to your PR tagging one of the maintainers and we'll be happy to help troubleshoot it.