Skip to content

Add speaker id to rt #183

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add speaker id to rt #183

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

TudorCRL
Copy link
Contributor

@TudorCRL TudorCRL commented Oct 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This realtime PR:

  • Updates the schema with a few recent refreshes
  • Adds speaker ID as a feature to RT with a new function, getSpeakers(final?: boolean) that let's users request the speaker IDs (and optionally wait until the end of the session to receive them)
  • Add setRecognitionConfig to react package

mnemitz
mnemitz approved these changes Oct 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mnemitz mnemitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just a couple admin notes:

  • If we're bumping to major version 8.0.0 for the real-time-client, I would suggest we also bump a major version for the React wrapper, as it re-exports many of the same fields
  • We should add to this PR description notes about some of the other messages/schema changes released as part of this change. I'm happy to do this part

examples/nodejs/real-time-file-example.ts
.map((r) => r.alternatives?.[0].content)
.join(' ');
process.stdout.write(`\r${finalText} \x1b[3m${partialText}\x1b[0m`);
console.log(`\r${finalText} \x1b[3m${partialText}\x1b[0m`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI the reason for process.stdout.write here was to avoid implicit line breaks, but not sure if this is dealt with another way now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah no, sorry - I only changed this due to debugging, so can undo those changes!

mnemitz
mnemitz reviewed Oct 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mnemitz mnemitz mnemitz approved these changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TudorCRL @mnemitz