Skip to content

Personal and interdepartamental economy #457

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

insoPL
Copy link

@insoPL insoPL commented May 4, 2025

This is my proposal for slow introduction of interdepartmental economy. It will Fast-track trade of common items and give depts more ways to earn funds.

PR part 1:
space-wizards/space-station-14#37358

@github-actions github-actions bot added Design Related to design documentation for Space Station 14. English labels May 4, 2025
@TaoNewt
Copy link

TaoNewt commented May 5, 2025

Would you open a discussion on the ss14 forum regarding this?
I think it's a nicer environment to discuss things and you will probably get more interaction.
Development > Feature Requests > space-station-14 and note that you're the developer.

@Djungelskog2
Copy link

I imagine something like this would have to be done all in one, the current station economy doc excluded player/personal economy intentionally.

@insoPL
Copy link
Author

insoPL commented May 12, 2025

I imagine something like this would have to be done all in one, the current station economy doc excluded player/personal economy intentionally.

It does not really exclude it. There is a way to transfer cash from dept to personal. You can buy it for TC. It's in maints, salvage can find it, it's in mail. People sometimes do rp with it.
Adding it in small increments to see how people react to it to find sweet spot between paid and free makes more sense to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Design Related to design documentation for Space Station 14. English
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants