Skip to content

Conversation

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor

Update this doc based on 0918's Routing WG's discussion. The meeting minutes could be found at

https://lists.sonicfoundation.dev/g/sonic-wg-routing/wiki/40585

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@lipxu lipxu self-requested a review September 25, 2025 01:50
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@pbrisset pbrisset left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any plan to attribute SONiC points to FRR commits, review?
Is there any plan to attribute SONiC points to maintainers?

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there any plan to attribute SONiC points to FRR commits, review? Is there any plan to attribute SONiC points to maintainers?

I will bring this discussion to TSC as a separate topic.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

Copy link

@venkit-nexthop venkit-nexthop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a few questions. But overall, this new upgrade process looks good to me.
Thanks for putting it together and getting consensus with the community.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor Author

@StormLiangMS @dgsudharsan @venkatmahalingam can you help to review it? I have taken care current comments. Need the approval from Microsfot, Nvidia and Dell before I present it to TSC.

@StormLiangMS
Copy link
Contributor

One thing I’d like to clarify: the release manager will review critical bug fixes from FRR on a monthly basis for the current release and the immediately preceding one, but not for all earlier releases, correct? I think that approach should be fine in most cases. However, considering the lifecycle of each SONiC release, should we consider extending it to cover the previous three releases? I agree this may not be as critical as the most recent one, and we can revisit it if the community feels it’s necessary. Everything else looks good to me — thanks a lot for driving this. @eddieruan-alibaba

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor Author

One thing I’d like to clarify: the release manager will review critical bug fixes from FRR on a monthly basis for the current release and the immediately preceding one, but not for all earlier releases, correct? I think that approach should be fine in most cases. However, considering the lifecycle of each SONiC release, should we consider extending it to cover the previous three releases? I agree this may not be as critical as the most recent one, and we can revisit it if the community feels it’s necessary. Everything else looks good to me — thanks a lot for driving this. @eddieruan-alibaba

Let's start with monitoring 2 releases. If we see the needs, we could update this doc in the future.

@eddieruan-alibaba
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dgsudharsan I got approvals from 5 different organizations. Need your approval to represent NV.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants