[Bugfix] Fix the build bug on A3 #97
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @raintBN-91, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical build issue on the A3 platform. The change involves a minor but essential modification to a common utility header, ensuring that the project compiles correctly and stably on the specified environment. This fix directly resolves the problem outlined in the related GitHub issue.
Highlights
- Build Fix: Resolved a build bug specifically affecting the A3 platform by adding a necessary header inclusion.
- Header Inclusion: The
<cstdint>header has been added tocsrc/utils/common.hto ensure proper type definitions and compilation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a build failure on A3 by including the <cstdint> header in csrc/utils/common.h. This is the correct fix for using types like uint32_t and uint64_t. I have provided one suggestion to improve code style by moving the new include inside the header guard, which aligns with the project's existing conventions and is a general best practice.
csrc/utils/common.h
Outdated
| #include <cstdint> | ||
| #ifndef UTILS_COMMON_H | ||
| #define UTILS_COMMON_H | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While adding <cstdint> fixes the build issue, it's good practice to place header includes inside the include guards. This prevents the header from being processed multiple times if this file is included in several places. It also aligns with the convention used in other headers in this project (e.g., csrc/utils/defines.h).
| #include <cstdint> | |
| #ifndef UTILS_COMMON_H | |
| #define UTILS_COMMON_H | |
| #ifndef UTILS_COMMON_H | |
| #define UTILS_COMMON_H | |
| #include <cstdint> |
Motivation:
Fix the build bug on A3:
Related issue: #96