Skip to content

Fix #359 - Add support to DSL 1.0.0 #367

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

fjtirado
Copy link
Collaborator

@fjtirado fjtirado commented May 30, 2024

Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!

What this PR does / why we need it:
fix #359
Special notes for reviewers:
Full refactor of the SDK to read files from the new DSL
Additional information (if needed):

@fjtirado fjtirado force-pushed the Fix_#359 branch 11 times, most recently from 1423aa5 to f98ff62 Compare May 30, 2024 19:11
@ricardozanini ricardozanini changed the title [Fix_#359] Migration to 0.10 DSL Fix #359 - Add support to DSL 1.0.0 May 31, 2024
@ricardozanini ricardozanini requested a review from manick02 May 31, 2024 13:49
Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the spec, we use feature to describe Gherkin tests and examples for actual workflow examples. Can we rename it here to keep ubiquity?

@fjtirado fjtirado force-pushed the Fix_#359 branch 2 times, most recently from 446c834 to 84943b5 Compare May 31, 2024 14:54
@fjtirado fjtirado force-pushed the Fix_#359 branch 10 times, most recently from 6c588f3 to 008f450 Compare June 13, 2024 17:42
fjtirado added 2 commits June 24, 2024 12:11
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <[email protected]>
@fjtirado fjtirado force-pushed the Fix_#359 branch 6 times, most recently from 907107f to dbf11fe Compare June 24, 2024 11:44
@fjtirado fjtirado marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2024 11:45
@fjtirado fjtirado requested a review from ricardozanini June 24, 2024 11:45
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <[email protected]>
@fjtirado fjtirado marked this pull request as draft June 25, 2024 16:26
@fjtirado fjtirado force-pushed the Fix_#359 branch 3 times, most recently from 54446d4 to 386c5d9 Compare June 25, 2024 17:29
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <[email protected]>
@fjtirado fjtirado marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 17:32
@fjtirado fjtirado requested a review from ricardozanini June 25, 2024 17:32
Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it functional already?

Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <[email protected]>
@fjtirado
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Is it functional already?

It is, but I do not like the TaskItem.getAdditionalProperties() (it can be seen in the unit test) and we can try to generate serialiazers rather than hardcoding them. Im not sure if that should be done with this PR or a follow up one

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

I suggest having the most effective one for a snapshot in the main, then open follow-up issues. We can add a milestone to communicate to the community the roadmap/directions of this new version.

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

WhiteSource is failing duo to their internal error.

@ricardozanini ricardozanini merged commit bd6cfe8 into serverlessworkflow:main Jun 26, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migration to new DSL (Specification 1.0.0)
2 participants