Skip to content

Conversation

SyedWasiHaider
Copy link
Contributor

@SyedWasiHaider SyedWasiHaider commented Sep 12, 2025

We'd like to hide this particular field since it is a redundant with a newer UI that already allows users to configure the table name. However, the field itself is still needed in the mapping for normal warehouse pipeline processing.

Testing

Include any additional information about the testing you have completed to
ensure your changes behave as expected. For a speedy review, please check
any of the tasks you completed below during your testing.

  • Added unit tests for new functionality
  • Tested end-to-end using the local server
  • [If destination is already live] Tested for backward compatibility of destination. Note: New required fields are a breaking change.
  • [Segmenters] Tested in the staging environment
  • [Segmenters] [If applicable for this change] Tested for regression with Hadron.

@joe-ayoub-segment
Copy link
Contributor

please label with "Ready to release" when you want this deployed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants