Skip to content

Add tests for pullRequests.grouping syntax #3654

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rtyley
Copy link
Contributor

@rtyley rtyley commented Jun 13, 2025

A colleague mentioned to me that some of our pullRequests.grouping were not pulling in all the artifacts we were expecting - while looking into this, I realised that I wasn't 100% clear on where wildcards could be used in pullRequests.grouping, so I wrote this test to exercise all the cases that were relevant to us, and see what worked - this may be tested elsewhere to some extent in the Scala Steward codebase, but I think it's helpful to drill into the specific functionality with these new tests on PullRequestUpdateFilter.

See also

rtyley added a commit to guardian/scala-steward-public-repos that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
@rtyley rtyley force-pushed the add-tests-to-clarify-pullRequests.grouping-syntax branch from 82650b4 to af9a7e4 Compare June 13, 2025 13:20
rtyley added a commit to guardian/scala-steward-public-repos that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
@rtyley rtyley changed the title Add tests to clarify pullRequests.grouping syntax Add tests for pullRequests.grouping syntax Jun 13, 2025
@rtyley rtyley force-pushed the add-tests-to-clarify-pullRequests.grouping-syntax branch from af9a7e4 to 942528d Compare June 13, 2025 14:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.83%. Comparing base (083ed69) to head (942528d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3654   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.83%   89.83%           
=======================================
  Files         174      174           
  Lines        5045     5045           
  Branches      495      495           
=======================================
  Hits         4532     4532           
  Misses        513      513           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant