Skip to content

Conversation

@en-sc
Copy link
Contributor

@en-sc en-sc commented Sep 15, 2025

Before the patch it was unclear whether mhselect[2] should be compared with the least significant or the most significant bit.

Fixes #1138

Before the patch it was unclear whether `mhselect[2]` should be compared
with the least significant or the most significant bit.

Fixes riscv#1138
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

It's unclear how mhselect[2] is concatenated with mhvalue

1 participant