Add article "What Code Review is not"

[nighca]

No description provided.

[niupilot]

🔍 PR Review: Adding Article "What Code Review is not"

I've completed my review of PR #45. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Read the new article file to understand content and structure
• Check repository organization and documentation conventions
• Analyze article quality, accuracy, and consistency
• Provide comprehensive review feedback
• Submit final review

---

📋 Review Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ Excellent contribution

This article is a well-written, insightful piece about common misconceptions around code reviews. The content is highly valuable for the 1024 实训营 community and aligns perfectly with the repository's educational mission.

🎯 Strengths

1. Clear Structure & Organization: The article follows a logical "what not to do" approach with 5 well-defined sections, each addressing a specific misconception.

2. Practical Value: Provides actionable insights that directly benefit the target audience (participants in 1024 实训营).

3. Consistent with Repository Standards:

   • Follows the established naming convention: 2025/[number]. [Chinese title]/[English filename].md
   • Matches the style and tone of other articles in the repository
   • Proper Chinese typography and formatting

4. Relevant Context: References 1024 实训营 specifically (lines 3, 64, 66), showing it was written with the target audience in mind.

5. Comprehensive Coverage: Addresses both traditional and modern aspects (including AI-assisted code review).

📝 Content Quality Analysis

Technical Accuracy: ✅ All technical points are sound and reflect best practices in software engineering.

Educational Value: ✅ Each section provides clear explanations of misconceptions and offers constructive alternatives.

Writing Quality: ✅ The Chinese writing is clear, professional, and engaging. Good use of examples and practical advice.

🏗️ Repository Integration

✅ Perfect fit for repository structure:

• Follows the year-based organization (2025/)
• Uses the established numbering system (14)
• Bilingual naming convention maintained
• Will integrate seamlessly into the README table of contents

🔍 Detailed Section Review

1. Section 1 (Lines 7-23): Excellent distinction between self-discoverable vs. external-perspective issues
2. Section 2 (Lines 24-40): Important perspective shift on reviewer vs. submitter responsibilities
3. Section 3 (Lines 42-48): Critical timing advice for design discussions
4. Section 4 (Lines 50-58): Great emphasis on bidirectional learning
5. Section 5 (Lines 60-66): Forward-thinking inclusion of AI in code review processes

🔧 Minor Suggestions (Optional)

1. README Update Needed: The article should be added to the README table. It would fit as entry 14 in the 2025 series:

   | 14   | Code Review 不是什么 | [📖 阅读](2025/14.%20Code%20Review%20不是什么/what-code-review-is-not.md) |

2. Consider Cross-references: Could potentially reference other relevant articles in the repository about engineering practices.

✅ Documentation Consistency Check

• Naming Convention: ✅ Follows [number]. [Chinese Title]/[english-filename].md
• Content Style: ✅ Matches repository tone and educational approach
• Technical Depth: ✅ Appropriate level for the target audience
• Cultural Context: ✅ Well-adapted for Chinese software engineering community

🎯 Recommendation

✅ APPROVE - This is a high-quality addition that will provide significant value to the 1024 实训营 community. The article is well-researched, clearly written, and addresses important misconceptions about code review practices.

The only follow-up needed is updating the README.md to include this article in the table of contents (entry 14 in the 2025 series).

---

👉 Want me to re-run this review? Just type /review in the comments! For more usage examples, visit CodeAgent GitHub Repository.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @nighca, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a comprehensive article designed to demystify the Code Review process by outlining what it is not. The content aims to foster a more effective and collaborative review environment by addressing common pitfalls and misunderstandings, ultimately enhancing code quality and team growth. It covers aspects from individual accountability in preparing code for review to the evolving landscape of AI-assisted code evaluation.

Highlights

• New Article Added: A new article titled "What Code Review is not" has been added to the repository. This article aims to clarify common misconceptions about the Code Review process.
• Clarifying Code Review Misconceptions: The article addresses five key areas where Code Review is often misunderstood, providing guidance on best practices and responsibilities for both submitters and reviewers.
• Submitter's Responsibility: It emphasizes that Code Review is not solely the reviewer's obligation, but rather a shared responsibility where the code submitter plays a crucial role in facilitating an effective review.
• Role of AI in Code Review: The article discusses the emerging role of AI in Code Review, highlighting its potential as a reviewer and the importance of reviewing AI-generated code due to potential imperfections.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

本次 PR 新增了一篇关于 Code Review 的文章，从反面阐述了“Code Review 不是什么”，内容翔实，观点明确，对于帮助开发者（尤其是新人）正确理解 Code Review 的目的和责任非常有价值。文章结构清晰，论述有力，整体质量很高。我提出了一些关于措辞和表达方式的微小建议，旨在让文章的语气更委婉，语言更规范，从而提升读者的阅读体验。