Skip to content

Conversation

mjeffryes
Copy link
Member

@mjeffryes mjeffryes commented Mar 21, 2025

Dry run for adding an action that would comment on very old issues and apply the awaiting-feedback label. (see Automate comments on stale issues, Stale Issues Proposal)

The action is configured to look for kind/bug issues that have not been updated in the last and have fewer than 2 upvotes. It would comment on these issues with the text:

Unfortunately, it looks like this issue hasn't seen any updates in a while. If you're still experiencing this issue, could you leave a quick comment to let us know so we can prioritize it?

and add the awaiting-feedback label. If a non-pulumi user replies, the issue will be bumped back into the triage queue using the usual automation. If no one replies, these issues will eventually show up in our "stale awaiting feedback" query on the team dashboards so we can take one last look at them and decide if we should close them.

Dry run for adding an action that would comment on very old issues and apply the awaiting-feedback label.  (see [Automate comments on stale issues](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UCGvPZ9m7vHpl5E6jIt8PUV7J6SVGOf-wMHrB4OfBt0/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.vmiybe9heukw), [Stale Issues Proposal](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dw7ehY3kchsyEO_M5z9vcpleHNEzwpTdl2G-8UnmpKQ/edit?tab=t.0))
Copy link
Member Author

@mjeffryes mjeffryes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mjeffryes mjeffryes changed the title Create stale_issues.yaml [DO NOT MERGE] Create stale_issues.yaml Mar 21, 2025
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.31%. Comparing base (eb234ea) to head (2d4303d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.31%   24.31%           
=======================================
  Files         364      364           
  Lines      145577   145577           
=======================================
  Hits        35401    35401           
  Misses     110077   110077           
  Partials       99       99           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to pulumi/ci-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
We've discussed this a few times, but never quite pulled the trigger.
This picks up the last PR: [[DO NOT MERGE] Create stale_issues.yaml ·
pulumi-aws/5366](pulumi/pulumi-aws#5366) which
tested this workflow against AWS. For this PR, I've kept the logic
identical to that test, just moving it to ci-mgmt and running it on a
cron:

The action is configured to look for kind/bug issues that have not been
updated in the last and have fewer than 2 upvotes. It would comment on
these issues with the text:
> Unfortunately, it looks like this issue hasn't seen any updates in a
while. If you're still experiencing this issue, could you leave a quick
comment to let us know so we can prioritize it?

and add the awaiting-feedback label. If a non-pulumi user replies, the
issue will be bumped back into the triage queue using the usual
automation. If no one replies, these issues will eventually show up in
our "stale awaiting feedback" query on the team dashboards so we can
take one last look at them and decide if we should close them.

The workflow defaults to just doing a dry run and I've added a new
config flag to turn off dryRun and comment/label the issues for real.
(So we can roll this out gradually to provider repos or disable it for a
single repo if needed.)
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to pulumi/ci-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
We've discussed this a few times, but never quite pulled the trigger.
This picks up the last PR: [[DO NOT MERGE] Create stale_issues.yaml ·
pulumi-aws/5366](pulumi/pulumi-aws#5366) which
tested this workflow against AWS. For this PR, I've kept the logic
identical to that test, just moving it to ci-mgmt and running it on a
cron:

The action is configured to look for kind/bug issues that have not been
updated in the last and have fewer than 2 upvotes. It would comment on
these issues with the text:
> Unfortunately, it looks like this issue hasn't seen any updates in a
while. If you're still experiencing this issue, could you leave a quick
comment to let us know so we can prioritize it?

and add the awaiting-feedback label. If a non-pulumi user replies, the
issue will be bumped back into the triage queue using the usual
automation. If no one replies, these issues will eventually show up in
our "stale awaiting feedback" query on the team dashboards so we can
take one last look at them and decide if we should close them.

The workflow defaults to just doing a dry run and I've added a new
config flag to turn off dryRun and comment/label the issues for real.
(So we can roll this out gradually to provider repos or disable it for a
single repo if needed.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant