fixes docutils warning for bullet list

[AllenSH12]

... also updates topo base types docs to fix typo and matches style from topo topo types

$ make html
...
topology_topo_types.rst:10: WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [docutils]

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update refines the introductory text in the topology documentation by correcting grammar, clarifying instructions, and improving list formatting. Additionally, it adds a clarifying sentence about the need to represent topology primitives in tables, introducing the concept of topology tables. No technical content or logic was changed.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_base_types.rst	Improved grammar, rephrased instructions, and reformatted references as a bulleted list.
postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst	Added a clarifying sentence introducing topology tables after the prerequisite resources list.

Possibly related PRs

• postgis/postgis-workshops#136: Also focuses on editorial improvements and formatting in the topology introduction documents.
• postgis/postgis-workshops#137: Involves clarifications and restructuring of topology concepts and list formatting in the same documentation area.

Poem

Hopping through docs with a tidy new list,
Grammar now shines where confusion once hissed.
A table for topology, clearly in sight,
With clarity guiding us into the light.
🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91c7eb0 and ef4fe3a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_base_types.rst (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_base_types.rst

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst (1)

8-9: Align bullet punctuation across docs.
Here the list items don’t end with periods, but in topology_base_types.rst they do. For consistency, add a trailing period to each bullet.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a5082b and 91c7eb0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_base_types.rst (1 hunks)
• postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_base_types.rst (2)

6-6: Rephrased prerequisites introduction for clarity.
The new sentence “Before reading this document, please review at least one of these resources:” reads more fluently and correctly prompts the reader.

---

8-10: Converted prerequisites to a bulleted list.
Using asterisks for each resource improves readability and aligns with reStructuredText conventions.

postgis-intro/sources/en/topology_topo_types.rst (1)

11-11: Good addition: topology tables concept.
This sentence neatly bridges theory and practical storage by introducing “topology tables.”