Skip to content

Conversation

omerdemirok
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Overmind

Open in Overmind ↗


🟢 Change Signals

Routine 🟢 Multiple AWS resources are showing routine activity with 3 events/day for the last day.

View signals ↗


🔥 Risks

No Significant Risk Identified for CloudWatch Alarm Configuration Low Open Risk ↗
No significant risks have been identified based on the current configuration of the CloudWatch alarm for Lambda function errors. The settings, such as comparison_operator, threshold, and evaluation_periods, align with typical configurations and do not present immediate concerns. The alarm name is unique, and the function name in dimensions matches the intended Lambda function. While actions are not specified, actions_enabled is set to true, indicating readiness for configuration. The handling of missing data is set to 'missing', which is a common practice to avoid false triggers. Overall, the configuration appears sound, and no further action is required at this time.

No Significant Risk in AWS Lambda Event Source Mapping Configuration for SQS Trigger Low Open Risk ↗
The analysis of the AWS Lambda event source mapping for the SQS trigger does not reveal any significant risks based on the provided configuration details. The event_source_arn is correctly pointing to the intended SQS queue, and the enabled attribute is set to true, ensuring the mapping is active. While the batch_size and maximum_retry_attempts could be optimized based on specific application needs, they do not present a significant risk in their current state. The absence of specific values for function_name and function_arn is noted, but given the context, it is reasonable to assume these will be correctly configured during deployment.

No Significant Risks in Lambda Function Configuration Low Open Risk ↗
No significant risks have been identified in the configuration of the AWS Lambda function image-processor-terraform-example. The deployment package, handler, memory allocation, timeout, IAM role permissions, and runtime compatibility are aligned with the application requirements.


🟣 Expected Changes

Note

No expected changes found.


🟠 Unmapped Changes

+ cloudwatch-alarm › module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm.lambda_errors
--- current
+++ proposed
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+type: cloudwatch-alarm
+id: github.com/overmindtech/terraform-example.cloudwatch-alarm.module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm.lambda_errors
+attributes:
+  actions_enabled: true
+  alarm_actions: null
+  alarm_description: This alarm monitors Lambda function errors
+  alarm_name: lambda-errors-terraform-example
+  arn: (known after apply)
+  comparison_operator: GreaterThanThreshold
+  datapoints_to_alarm: null
+  dimensions:
+    FunctionName: image-processor-terraform-example
+  evaluate_low_sample_count_percentiles: (known after apply)
+  evaluation_periods: 2
+  extended_statistic: null
+  id: (known after apply)
+  insufficient_data_actions: null
+  metric_name: Errors
+  namespace: AWS/Lambda
+  ok_actions: null
+  period: 60
+  statistic: Sum
+  tags:
+    Environment: terraform-example
+    Name: Lambda Errors Alarm
+    Scenario: Message Size Breach
+  tags_all:
+    Environment: terraform-example
+    Name: Lambda Errors Alarm
+    Scenario: Message Size Breach
+  terraform_address: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm.lambda_errors
+  terraform_name: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm.lambda_errors
+  threshold: 5
+  threshold_metric_id: null
+  treat_missing_data: missing
+  unit: null
+ aws_lambda_event_source_mapping › module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_event_source_mapping.sqs_trigger
--- current
+++ proposed
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+type: aws_lambda_event_source_mapping
+id: github.com/overmindtech/terraform-example.aws_lambda_event_source_mapping.module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_event_source_mapping.sqs_trigger
+attributes:
+  amazon_managed_kafka_event_source_config: (known after apply)
+  arn: (known after apply)
+  batch_size: 10
+  bisect_batch_on_function_error: null
+  enabled: true
+  event_source_arn: arn:aws:sqs:eu-west-2:540044833068:image-processing-terraform-example
+  function_arn: (known after apply)
+  function_name: (known after apply)
+  function_response_types: null
+  id: (known after apply)
+  kms_key_arn: null
+  last_modified: (known after apply)
+  last_processing_result: (known after apply)
+  maximum_batching_window_in_seconds: 5
+  maximum_record_age_in_seconds: (known after apply)
+  maximum_retry_attempts: 3
+  parallelization_factor: (known after apply)
+  queues: null
+  self_managed_kafka_event_source_config: (known after apply)
+  starting_position: null
+  starting_position_timestamp: null
+  state: (known after apply)
+  state_transition_reason: (known after apply)
+  tags: null
+  tags_all: (known after apply)
+  terraform_address: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_event_source_mapping.sqs_trigger
+  terraform_name: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_event_source_mapping.sqs_trigger
+  topics: null
+  tumbling_window_in_seconds: null
+  uuid: (known after apply)
+ aws_lambda_function › module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_function.image_processor
--- current
+++ proposed
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+type: aws_lambda_function
+id: github.com/overmindtech/terraform-example.aws_lambda_function.module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_function.image_processor
+attributes:
+  architectures: (known after apply)
+  arn: (known after apply)
+  code_sha256: (known after apply)
+  code_signing_config_arn: null
+  description: null
+  ephemeral_storage: (known after apply)
+  filename: modules/scenarios/message-size-breach/lambda_function.zip
+  function_name: image-processor-terraform-example
+  handler: lambda_function.lambda_handler
+  id: (known after apply)
+  image_uri: null
+  invoke_arn: (known after apply)
+  kms_key_arn: null
+  last_modified: (known after apply)
+  layers: null
+  logging_config: (known after apply)
+  memory_size: 1024
+  package_type: Zip
+  publish: false
+  qualified_arn: (known after apply)
+  qualified_invoke_arn: (known after apply)
+  replace_security_groups_on_destroy: null
+  replacement_security_group_ids: null
+  reserved_concurrent_executions: -1
+  role: arn:aws:iam::540044833068:role/image-processor-lambda-role-terraform-example
+  runtime: python3.9
+  s3_bucket: null
+  s3_key: null
+  s3_object_version: null
+  signing_job_arn: (known after apply)
+  signing_profile_version_arn: (known after apply)
+  skip_destroy: false
+  source_code_hash: mMMwfSINMw8K3MiGaVuM4l2UHmgB+qZqX+Y26IWJut0=
+  source_code_size: (known after apply)
+  tags:
+    Environment: terraform-example
+    Name: Image Processor
+    Scenario: Message Size Breach
+  tags_all:
+    Environment: terraform-example
+    Name: Image Processor
+    Scenario: Message Size Breach
+  terraform_address: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_function.image_processor
+  terraform_name: module.scenarios[0].module.message_size_breach[0].aws_lambda_function.image_processor
+  timeout: 180
+  timeouts: null
+  tracing_config: (known after apply)
+  version: (known after apply)

💥 Blast Radius

Items 0

Edges 0

@omerdemirok omerdemirok merged commit 2a29421 into main Sep 23, 2025
5 checks passed
@omerdemirok omerdemirok deleted the fix/message-size-breach-3 branch September 23, 2025 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant