Skip to content

Conversation

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen commented Nov 25, 2025

What I did:
This updates the Should properly transition through MCN conditions on rebootless node update test to apply a MC against the master MCP for any cluster where no worker MCP machines exist. Previously, only SNO clusters were treated differently, leading to issues with the test when the two-node fencing tests were turned on.

How to verify:

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repository is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65970, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 25, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 25, 2025
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@isabella-janssen: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f52e2a20-ca16-11f0-9a59-0f175180fd13-0

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65970, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sergiordlr November 25, 2025 16:04
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65970, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

What I did:
This updates the Should properly transition through MCN conditions on rebootless node update test to apply a MC against the master MCP for any cluster where no worker MCP machines exist. Previously, only SNO clusters were treated differently, leading to issues with the test when the two-node fencing tests were turned on.

How to verify:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-serial periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@isabella-janssen: trigger 6 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/5bab7270-d0c6-11f0-8c44-8223dd6a90bd-0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants