OCPEDGE-2090: Add validation tests for tnf topology effects #30252
Conversation
updated tests to always target two node topology instead of being a suite tests small refactor and testing name change Signed-off-by: ehila <[email protected]>
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-2090 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-techpreview |
|
@eggfoobar: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/59b62d40-8ffb-11f0-88d3-77832bfb0434-0 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-techpreview |
|
@eggfoobar: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/5f232f30-8ffb-11f0-8422-eda9c7f79cd3-0 |
|
/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing |
eggfoobar
force-pushed
the
add-tnf-check-tests
branch
from
b0e78b9 to
378bf9b
Compare
|
@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-2090 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing |
|
/approve |
|
Reviewed in this thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C07ABRBBDK3/p1757696848339999 |
|
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: 378bf9b
New tests seen in this PR at sha: 378bf9b
|
added test to check platform type is set to baremetal or none added test to check baremetal hosts are set to detached fixed suite filter to capture OCPFeatureGate Signed-off-by: ehila <[email protected]>
eggfoobar
force-pushed
the
add-tnf-check-tests
branch
from
378bf9b to
f31169c
Compare
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing-recovery-techpreview |
|
@eggfoobar: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/ad12b110-9042-11f0-89a3-31730936a01e-0 |
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: eggfoobar, jaypoulz, sosiouxme The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
/verified by "[sig-etcd][apigroup:config.openshift.io][OCPFeatureGate:DualReplica] Two Node with Fencing should have etcd pods and containers configured correctly [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" , "[sig-etcd][apigroup:config.openshift.io][OCPFeatureGate:DualReplica] Two Node with Fencing should have podman etcd containers running on each node [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@sosiouxme: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
2 similar comments
|
@eggfoobar: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: f31169c
|
updated tests to always target two node topology instead of being a suite tests
small refactor and testing name change
added test to check platform type is set to baremetal or none
added test to check baremetal hosts are set to detached