-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
OCPBUGS-57352: reduce cache expiry frequency [release-4.19] #1019
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-57352: reduce cache expiry frequency [release-4.19] #1019
Conversation
Signed-off-by: grokspawn <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: bf9ffe8b04b59e9acd859ac8a9b6698f1f2a3437
@grokspawn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57352, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@grokspawn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57352, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@grokspawn: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
@grokspawn: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57352, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Test PASS, detail https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-57352 |
/jira backport release-4.18,release-4.17,release-4.16,release-4.15 |
@grokspawn: The following backport issues have been created:
Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/lgtm |
4a6530a
into
openshift:release-4.19
@grokspawn: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57352: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57352 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #1020 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #1021 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #1022 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #1023 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools |
Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: bf9ffe8b04b59e9acd859ac8a9b6698f1f2a3437