Skip to content

8363949: Incorrect jtreg header in MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java #26527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

toxaart
Copy link
Contributor

@toxaart toxaart commented Jul 29, 2025

Hi, please consider the following changes:

the mentioned test fails if run standalone with the following error:
Error: Not a test or directory containing tests: runtime/Monitor/MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java

The order of jtreg tags is not correct, to make it pass standalone it is sufficient to put @test first in each test.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8363949: Incorrect jtreg header in MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26527/head:pull/26527
$ git checkout pull/26527

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26527
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26527/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26527

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26527

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26527.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 29, 2025

👋 Welcome back toxaart! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2025

@toxaart This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8363949: Incorrect jtreg header in MonitorWithDeadObjectTest.java

Reviewed-by: stefank, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@stefank, @coleenp) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2025

@toxaart The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@toxaart toxaart marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 09:44
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 29, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 29, 2025
@stefank
Copy link
Member

stefank commented Jul 29, 2025

I think the JBS issue summary needs to be updated to reflect that it is the @requires tag that is problematic and not the @bug tag.

I'm also wondering if there's anything we need to do to our test infrastructure to find these issues automatically? As I understand it, this was only found because @TobiHartmann went and manually tried to find issues like this. Maybe @lmesnik has some insights here or knows someone who deals with this part of the test infra.

@toxaart
Copy link
Contributor Author

toxaart commented Jul 29, 2025

I think the JBS issue summary needs to be updated to reflect that it is the @requires tag that is problematic and not the @bug tag.

I updated the JBS issue as suggested.

Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants