Skip to content

Conversation

@MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor

@MAJigsaw77 MAJigsaw77 commented Mar 14, 2025

  • Removed armv7 by default → Modern devices use arm64; keeping armv7 adds overhead.
  • Removed armv5 completely → Too old, rarely used, and complicates maintenance.

@MAJigsaw77 MAJigsaw77 requested a review from tobil4sk March 14, 2025 11:06
Copy link
Member

@tobil4sk tobil4sk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 16, 2025

why don't we remove armv5, armv6, mips and mipsel entirely? they're now not compatible with 2025 standarts

@tobil4sk
Copy link
Member

If we are intending to support older ndks for now (see #1925), then it may make sense to leave in armv5

@MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor Author

If we are intending to support older ndks for now (see #1925), then it may make sense to leave in armv5

I doubt anyone would use armv5 anymore tho.

@player-03 player-03 changed the title Some architecture adjustments to Android. [Android] Phase out older ARM architectures Oct 22, 2025
@player-03 player-03 changed the base branch from 8.3.0-Dev to 9.0.0-dev October 22, 2025 22:55
@player-03
Copy link
Contributor

If we're going to drop support for armv5 and older NDKs, it would probably happen in a major release, like 9.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants