Skip to content

Update SECURITY-INSIGHTS #194

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

Update SECURITY-INSIGHTS #194

merged 8 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025

Conversation

aaguiarz
Copy link
Member

@aaguiarz aaguiarz commented Aug 6, 2025

Automated update of SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a Security Insights configuration file outlining security practices, team contacts, licensing, release information, and integrated security tools for the repository.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2025 10:22
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

Walkthrough

A new .github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml file has been added, introducing a Security Insights 2.0 configuration for the OpenFGA Java SDK repository. This file documents metadata, repository details, licensing, release and documentation links, security assessments, champions, and integrated security tools.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Security Insights Configuration
.github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml
Added a Security Insights 2.0 configuration file specifying repository metadata, team, policies, security tools, and documentation links.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/security-insights

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 33.73%. Comparing base (ff7aa69) to head (5d21ffd).

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (33.73%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #194   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     33.73%   33.73%           
  Complexity     1005     1005           
=========================================
  Files           182      182           
  Lines          6900     6900           
  Branches        778      778           
=========================================
  Hits           2328     2328           
  Misses         4467     4467           
  Partials        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml (1)

66-95: Pin tool versions instead of latest for reproducible security posture.

Using the string latest makes the build non-deterministic and complicates incident forensics.
Capture a known-good version/tag for Dependabot, Snyk, and Socket or document an automated update policy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff7aa69 and 5d21ffd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml (1)

11-17: Confirm non-standard key no-third-party-packages with the SI schema.

The official Security-Insights 2.0 spec does not document this field. If the validator rejects unknown keys, the whole file will be considered invalid.
Please run the upstream validator or CI check to confirm acceptance (and rename/remove if necessary).

@rhamzeh rhamzeh added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit b3ccf6f Aug 7, 2025
24 checks passed
@rhamzeh rhamzeh deleted the feat/security-insights branch August 7, 2025 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants