Skip to content

Conversation

EruEri
Copy link
Contributor

@EruEri EruEri commented Aug 30, 2025

A library to read cue file.

@jmid
Copy link
Contributor

jmid commented Sep 1, 2025

Thanks! CI is timing out on the FreeBSD runners, which can be disregarded.

Would you consider adding a x-maintenance-intent entry? https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/opam-repository-archive-clarification-of-the-opam-fields

fix: angstrom lower constraint version

opam: add x-maintenance-intent
@EruEri
Copy link
Contributor Author

EruEri commented Sep 1, 2025

Yes. Sorry I wasn't aware about the x-maintenance-intent field.

@EruEri
Copy link
Contributor Author

EruEri commented Sep 1, 2025

Should I also add the x-maintenance-intent field on packages that I have already published ?

@jmid
Copy link
Contributor

jmid commented Sep 1, 2025

Yes. Sorry I wasn't aware about the x-maintenance-intent field.

No problem, it is still a relatively new initiative AFAIU 👍

Should I also add the x-maintenance-intent field on packages that I have already published ?

Yes, you are very welcome to. It will help retire old versions and save needless CI CPU cycles retesting them.

@EruEri
Copy link
Contributor Author

EruEri commented Sep 3, 2025

Yes. I will also add this field to the other packages as soon as I can.

@raphael-proust
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the addition!

@raphael-proust raphael-proust merged commit 8f9c790 into ocaml:master Sep 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@shonfeder
Copy link
Contributor

@EruEri the maintenance intent is currently derived from the value on the most recent package, so I don't think there is any need for you to add this to older package versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants