Skip to content

Conversation

@jainpawan21
Copy link
Member

@jainpawan21 jainpawan21 commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added "Topic Management" and "Layouts" as new features to all pricing plans.
  • Updates

    • Updated the features listed for each pricing plan to reflect the latest offerings.
    • Removed references to certain workflow and provider features, as well as API rate limits, from all plans.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The pricing plans data structure was updated by removing several platform feature properties and the entire API rate limits section from all plan tiers. New properties for topic management and layouts were added to each plan's platform features. Corresponding label updates were made to reflect these changes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/data/pricing-plans.js Removed guiWorkflow, codeWorkflow, providers, stepControl, and apiRateLimits from plans; added topicManagement and layouts properties; updated LABELS accordingly.

Estimated code review effort

2 (~15 minutes)

Poem

A bunny hopped through pricing plans,
Tidying features with gentle hands.
Out with old, in with new,
"Layouts" and "topics" now in view!
No more limits, just open skies—
A carrot for every user's eyes! 🥕

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm warn ERESOLVE overriding peer dependency
npm warn While resolving: [email protected]
npm warn Found: [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/react
npm warn dev react@"^18.3.1" from the root project
npm warn 197 more (@apollo/client, @ark-ui/react, @calcom/embed-react, ...)
npm warn
npm warn Could not resolve dependency:
npm warn peer react@"0.0.0-experimental-c8b778b7f-20220825" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/react-server-dom-webpack
npm warn react-server-dom-webpack@"0.0.0-experimental-c8b778b7f-20220825" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/gatsby
npm warn
npm warn Conflicting peer dependency: [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/react
npm warn peer react@"0.0.0-experimental-c8b778b7f-20220825" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/react-server-dom-webpack
npm warn react-server-dom-w

... [truncated 1853 characters] ...

npm warn node_modules/gatsby/node_modules/eslint-config-react-app
npm warn eslint-config-react-app@"^6.0.0" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/gatsby
npm warn
npm warn Conflicting peer dependency: @typescript-eslint/[email protected]
npm warn node_modules/@typescript-eslint/parser
npm warn peer @typescript-eslint/parser@"^4.0.0" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/gatsby/node_modules/eslint-config-react-app
npm warn eslint-config-react-app@"^6.0.0" from [email protected]
npm warn node_modules/gatsby
npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-07-23T12_53_12_412Z-debug-0.log

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b21018 and 6dbc3b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/data/pricing-plans.js (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/data/pricing-plans.js (8)

23-25: Inconsistency detected: stepControl property still present.

The AI summary indicates that stepControl should have been removed from all plan tiers, but it's still present at line 23. Please verify if this property should be removed as stated in the summary.

The addition of layouts: true looks correct.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if stepControl property exists across all plan tiers
# Expected: Should show if stepControl is present in other tiers too

echo "Checking stepControl property across all plan tiers:"
rg -A 1 -B 1 "stepControl:" src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/data/pricing-plans.js

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


68-68: LGTM: Consistent topicManagement implementation.

The topicManagement: true property is consistently applied in the pro tier.


75-75: LGTM: Consistent layouts implementation.

The layouts: true property is consistently applied in the pro tier.


119-119: LGTM: Consistent topicManagement implementation.

The topicManagement: true property is consistently applied in the team tier.


125-125: LGTM: Consistent layouts implementation.

The layouts: true property is consistently applied in the team tier.


168-174: LGTM: Consistent implementation in enterprise tier.

Both topicManagement: true (line 168) and layouts: true (line 174) are consistently applied in the enterprise tier, maintaining consistency across all plan tiers.


18-18: topicManagement property is consistent across all pricing tiers

Verified that topicManagement: true appears in the Free, Pro, Team, and Enterprise plan definitions, and that the corresponding label ('Topic management') is present in the feature headers. No further changes needed.


219-225: LABELS block is clean—no stale labels remain

Verified that the LABELS object (lines 203–263) contains no entries for guiWorkflow, codeWorkflow, providers, or stepControl. The new labels for topicManagement (“Topic management”) and layouts (“Email layouts”) are correct and consistent.

All set to approve.

configuration: '80',
global: '120',
},

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify complete removal of apiRateLimits section.

This formatting change likely indicates where the apiRateLimits section was removed. Please verify that the apiRateLimits property has been completely removed from all plan tiers as intended.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify apiRateLimits section has been completely removed
# Expected: Should return no results if properly removed

echo "Checking for any remaining apiRateLimits references:"
rg -i "apiRateLimit" src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/data/pricing-plans.js

Length of output: 200


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Recursively search for any leftover apiRateLimit(s) references across the repo
echo "Verifying removal of 'apiRateLimit' and 'apiRateLimits' across the repository:"
rg -n -i "apiRateLimits?" .

Length of output: 442


Remove leftover apiRateLimits references in plan-card.jsx

The apiRateLimits property has been removed from the pricing plans data file, but there are still two references in the plan-card component. These will break at runtime and need to be cleaned up or replaced:

• src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/plan-card/plan-card.jsx:23
– Remove apiRateLimits from the destructured props.
• src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/plan-card/plan-card.jsx:59
– Replace or remove <FeatureList features={apiRateLimits} … />.

Please update the component to use the correct feature list (e.g. features or another prop) or remove these references entirely.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/components/pages/pricing/pricing-table/plan-card/plan-card.jsx at lines
23 and 59, remove the references to the now non-existent apiRateLimits property.
Specifically, delete apiRateLimits from the destructured props at line 23 and
either remove or replace the <FeatureList features={apiRateLimits} /> usage at
line 59 with the appropriate existing prop such as features, ensuring no runtime
errors occur due to missing data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants