Skip to content

Conversation

rguo123
Copy link
Contributor

@rguo123 rguo123 commented Apr 25, 2025

Important

Adds numbermatcher function to src/selection.ts for handling number-based matching in DataSelection, updating add_identifier_column to support number arrays.

  • Behavior:
    • Adds numbermatcher function in src/selection.ts for handling number-based matching in DataSelection.
    • Updates add_identifier_column in DataSelection to use numbermatcher for number arrays.
  • Error Handling:
    • Logs error to console if codes[0] type is unrecognized in add_identifier_column.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 4de6b28. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

rguo123 commented Apr 25, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@rguo123 rguo123 marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2025 18:54
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to 4de6b28 in 2 minutes and 25 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 43 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. src/selection.ts:879
  • Draft comment:
    DRY: The code for assigning the transformation and applying it is duplicated across type branches. Consider refactoring the common logic into a helper to avoid repetition.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. src/selection.ts:915
  • Draft comment:
    Code clarity: Instead of using the short-circuit operator for side effects (i.e. 'matchings.has(values[i]) && bitmask.set(i)'), consider using an explicit if-statement for better readability.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 70% The short-circuit && operator is a common and well-understood pattern in JavaScript/TypeScript, especially for conditional execution. While an if statement would be more verbose, the current code is not unclear. The same pattern is used in the bigintmatcher function above, suggesting this is a consistent style choice. The code is performance-sensitive as it runs in a tight loop over potentially large datasets. The if statement version would be more explicit and potentially more readable for junior developers. The current pattern could be seen as a "trick" by some. The short-circuit && pattern is idiomatic in JavaScript/TypeScript and using it consistently across similar functions aids readability. In performance-sensitive code, concise expressions can be preferable. The comment should be deleted. The current code uses a common JavaScript idiom consistently and changing it would not meaningfully improve clarity.
3. src/selection.ts:877
  • Draft comment:
    When checking codes[0] to determine its type, consider handling the case when the codes array is empty to avoid unexpected undefined behavior.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. src/selection.ts:390
  • Draft comment:
    Typo: In the documentation comment for the selection name (line 390), 'colun' should be corrected to 'column'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. src/selection.ts:217
  • Draft comment:
    Typo: In the comment within the Bitmask.which() method (around line 217), 'THese are sparse...' should be corrected to 'These are sparse...'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_ovSukLj30Ut45aYz

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

const matchings = new Set(matches);
return async function (tile: Tile) {
const col = (await tile.get_column(field, subfield)).data[0];
const values = col.values as number[];
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new numbermatcher function duplicates logic from bigintmatcher. Consider refactoring common parts to adhere to DRY principles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants