Skip to content

WIP: POC: refactor node tree using query dtos #3944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: 9.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mhsdesign
Copy link
Member

New name "@neos-project/neos-use" aupair with "react-use".

- Adjusted to the correct `dependencies`
- now uses the neos context and redux react context directly instead of booting a custom one
- useI18n was removed in favour of the `translate` function
- removed lots of plugin specific workaround that are not necessary as part of the core code like typescript stubs etc.
New name "@neos-project/neos-node-tree".

- Adjusted to the correct `dependencies`
- now uses the neos context and redux react context directly instead of booting a custom one
- useI18n was removed in favour of the `translate` function
- removed lots of plugin specific workaround that are not necessary as part of the core code like typescript stubs etc.
... initialisation fails because of

Absolute node paths must serialized beginning with the pattern \"\/<My.Package:Root>\" ,\"{\"contentRepositoryId\":\"onedimension\",\"workspaceName\":\"admin-admington\",\"dimensionSpacePoint\":{\"language\":\"en_US\"},\"aggregateId\":\"f676459d-ca77-44bc-aeea-44114814c279\"}\" does not"
…ntext path

a node address is not an absolute node path - that failed before
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 9.0 label Apr 23, 2025
@Sebobo
Copy link
Member

Sebobo commented Apr 24, 2025

Cool, but what issue is resolved with this? What is the benefit? Do you have something to link to? :)

@mhsdesign
Copy link
Member Author

We discussed during the development meetings that we want to try this out to see if the tree is more performant and better maintainable. Putting the load on the server is a pattern we started using already for some things which is more explained here in this POC #3331

A full description of the code this change is based on can be found here sitegeist/Sitegeist.Archaeopteryx#63

@simonschaufi
Copy link

I guess yarn cache files should not be commited

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants