Skip to content

Conversation

@dukesphere
Copy link
Contributor

Writer's Quality Checklist

Before merging your PR, did you:

  • Run spell checker
  • Run link checker to check for broken xrefs
  • Check for orphan files
  • Perform a local build and do a final visual check of your content, including checking for:
    • Broken images
    • Dead links
    • Correct rendering of partials if they are used in your content
    • Formatting issues, such as:
      • Misnumbered ordered lists (steps) or incorrectly nested unordered lists
      • Messed up tables
      • Proper indentation
      • Correct header levels
  • Receive final review and signoff from:
    • Technical SME
    • Product Manager
    • Editor or peer reviewer
    • Reporter, if this content is in response to a reported issue (internal or external feedback)
  • If applicable, verify that the software actually got released

@dukesphere dukesphere added the DO NOT MERGE (YET) This is a work in progress. Do not merge nor review these changes yet label Nov 17, 2022
@dukesphere dukesphere requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2022 00:46
@dukesphere dukesphere self-assigned this Nov 17, 2022
*** xref:dynamic-evaluate-component-reference.adoc[Dynamic Evaluate Component]
*** xref:first-successful.adoc[First Successful Router]
*** xref:flow-component.adoc[Flow and Subflow Scopes]
*** xref:about-flows.adoc[Flow and Subflow Scopes]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consolidate these

@dukesphere dukesphere changed the base branch from v4.4 to v4.5 April 3, 2023 20:20
@dukesphere dukesphere changed the base branch from v4.5 to v4.4 April 3, 2023 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

DO NOT MERGE (YET) This is a work in progress. Do not merge nor review these changes yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants