Skip to content

Update CommitteeRegressor.rst #156

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update CommitteeRegressor.rst #156

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/source/content/models/CommitteeRegressor.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Measuring disagreement

With an ensemble of regressors like in the CommitteeRegressor model, a measure of disagreement can be the standard deviation of predictions, which provides a simple way to query for labels. This is not the case in general: for ordinary regressors, it is difficult to come up with viable query strategies because they don't always provide a way to measure uncertainty. (One notable exception is the Gaussian process regressor.)

This is demonstrated in `this example <../examples/Ensemble-regression.html>`__, where two regressors are trained on distinct subsets of the same dataset. In the figure below, the regressors are shown along with the mean predictions and the standard deviation.
This is demonstrated in `this example <../examples/ensemble-regression.html>`__, where two regressors are trained on distinct subsets of the same dataset. In the figure below, the regressors are shown along with the mean predictions and the standard deviation.

.. image:: img/er-initial.png
:align: center