An R implementation of: TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular
Learning (Sercan O. Arik, Tomas
Pfister).
The code in this repository started by an R port using the
torch package of
dreamquark-ai/tabnet
implementation.
TabNet is now augmented with
-
Coherent Hierarchical Multi-label Classification Networks (Eleonora Giunchiglia et Al.) for hierarchical outcomes
-
Optimizing ROC Curves with a Sort-Based Surrogate Loss for Binary Classification and Changepoint Detection (J Hillman, TD Hocking) for imbalanced binary classification.
Install {tabnet} from CRAN with:
install.packages('tabnet')
The development version can be installed from GitHub with:
# install.packages("pak")
pak::pak("mlverse/tabnet")
Here we show a binary classification example of the attrition
dataset, using a recipe for dataset input specification.
library(tabnet)
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(recipes))
library(yardstick)
library(ggplot2)
set.seed(1)
data("attrition", package = "modeldata")
test_idx <- sample.int(nrow(attrition), size = 0.2 * nrow(attrition))
train <- attrition[-test_idx,]
test <- attrition[test_idx,]
rec <- recipe(Attrition ~ ., data = train) %>%
step_normalize(all_numeric(), -all_outcomes())
fit <- tabnet_fit(rec, train, epochs = 30, valid_split=0.1, learn_rate = 5e-3)
autoplot(fit)
The plots gives you an immediate insight about model over-fitting, and if any, the available model checkpoints available before the over-fitting
Keep in mind that regression as well as multi-class classification are also available, and that you can specify dataset through data.frame and formula as well. You will find them in the package vignettes.
As the standard method predict()
is used, you can rely on your usual
metric functions for model performance results. Here we use {yardstick}
:
metrics <- metric_set(accuracy, precision, recall)
cbind(test, predict(fit, test)) %>%
metrics(Attrition, estimate = .pred_class)
#> # A tibble: 3 × 3
#> .metric .estimator .estimate
#> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 accuracy binary 0.840
#> 2 precision binary 0.840
#> 3 recall binary 1
cbind(test, predict(fit, test, type = "prob")) %>%
roc_auc(Attrition, .pred_No)
#> # A tibble: 1 × 3
#> .metric .estimator .estimate
#> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 roc_auc binary 0.466
TabNet has intrinsic explainability feature through the visualization of attention map, either aggregated:
explain <- tabnet_explain(fit, test)
autoplot(explain)
or at each layer through the type = "steps"
option:
autoplot(explain, type = "steps")
For cases when a consistent part of your dataset has no outcome, TabNet offers a self-supervised training step allowing to model to capture predictors intrinsic features and predictors interactions, upfront the supervised task.
pretrain <- tabnet_pretrain(rec, train, epochs = 50, valid_split=0.1, learn_rate = 1e-2)
autoplot(pretrain)
The example here is a toy example as the train
dataset does actually
contain outcomes. The vignette
vignette("selfsupervised_training")
will gives you the complete correct workflow step-by-step.
The integration within tidymodels workflows offers you unlimited opportunity to compare {tabnet} models with challengers.
Don’t miss the
vignette("tidymodels-interface")
for that.
{tabnet} leverage the masking mechanism to deal with missing data, so you don’t have to remove the entries in your dataset with some missing values in the predictors variables.
See
vignette("Missing_data_predictors")
{tabnet} includes a Area under the nn_aum_loss()
dedicated to your imbalanced binary classification
tasks.
Try it out in vignette("aum_loss")
Group | Feature | {tabnet} | dreamquark-ai | fast-tabnet |
---|---|---|---|---|
Input format | data-frame | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
formula | ✅ | |||
recipe | ✅ | |||
Node | ✅ | |||
missings in predictor | ✅ | |||
Output format | data-frame | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
workflow | ✅ | |||
ML Tasks | self-supervised learning | ✅ | ✅ | |
classification (binary, multi-class) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
unbalanced binary classification | ✅ | |||
regression | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
multi-outcome | ✅ | ✅ | ||
hierarchical multi-label classif. | ✅ | |||
Model management | from / to file | ✅ | ✅ | v |
resume from snapshot | ✅ | |||
training diagnostic | ✅ | |||
Interpretability | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
Performance | 1 x | 2 - 4 x | ||
Code quality | test coverage | 85% | ||
continuous integration | 4 OS including GPU |
Alternative TabNet implementation features