Wiremock module

[PhilHardwick]

Adds support for wiremock via testcontainers.

Provides properties:

• wiremock.port
• wiremock.host
• wiremock.url

No current way to configure mappings or extra files on the container, that can be added in another PR.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[melix]

Thanks for the pull request. Would you mind explaining how you would use it in a test?

[PhilHardwick]

Sure I would use it like:

@MicronautTest
public class TestUsingWiremock {

    @Value("${wiremock.url}") // can just use the port here too
    String wiremockUrl;
    private WireMock wireMock;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        URI uri = URI.create(wiremockUrl); // if using just the port this isn't needed
        // configure static access
        WireMock.configureFor(uri.getHost(), uri.getPort());
        // or an instance of the wiremock client
        wireMock = WireMock.create().port(uri.getPort()).build();
        wireMock.register(get(urlEqualTo("/health"))
                .willReturn(aResponse().withBody("ok").withStatus(200)));
    }
}

Does this need to be in the docs?

[melix]

Not necessarily in the docs, I was thinking that it wouldn't be quite useful without mappings, but since I'm not familiar with Wiremock, I see from your example that this can be configured "externally" somehow.

[PhilHardwick]

yeah mappings are like static requests and responses in files. I mainly use Wiremock through the client and configure the requests and responses in the test that needs it.

To be honest I'm not sure how the mappings stuff would work with the files and the classpath, especially since test resources is in a separate process. I imagine it would need to be in src/testResources/resources

[melix]

To be honest I'm not sure how the mappings stuff would work with the files and the classpath, especially since test resources is in a separate process. I imagine it would need to be in src/testResources/resources

Either that, or you would have to add a dependency on the test resources classpath which contains your mappings. But I think it's useful to support this.

[sdelamo]

we have a tutorial with Wiremock. it would be used to try to re-write that sample app using this test resources integration instead. https://guides.micronaut.io/latest/testing-rest-api-integrations-using-mockserver.html