Skip to content

Ignore NoopMeter in firstChild scan in CompositeMeters #1442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jake-at-work
Copy link

@jake-at-work jake-at-work commented May 30, 2019

Make CompositeMeters return a meter value if at least one of the child
Meters is not a NoopMeter.

See #1441

Make CompositeMeters return a meter value if at least one of the child
Meters is not a NoopMeter.
@shakuzen shakuzen changed the title #1441: Ignore NoopMeter in firstChild scan in CompositeMeters. Ignore NoopMeter in firstChild scan in CompositeMeters Jun 17, 2019
@shakuzen
Copy link
Member

shakuzen commented Mar 3, 2022

Sorry for the long time without reviewing this. Would you be willing to add tests for this along with the fix?

@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@pivotal-jbarrett Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@shakuzen
Copy link
Member

shakuzen commented Mar 3, 2022

Also, since it sounds like this is a bug and users should not be relying on this behavior, could you rebase the changes on the 1.7.x branch so we can include it in upcoming maintenance releases?

@shakuzen shakuzen added the waiting for feedback We need additional information before we can continue label Mar 3, 2022
Copy link

If you would like us to look at this PR, please provide the requested information. If the information is not provided within the next 7 days this PR will be closed.

@jonatan-ivanov jonatan-ivanov removed waiting for feedback We need additional information before we can continue feedback-reminder labels Jan 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants