Cargo 0.89 #87
Open
Cargo 0.89 #87
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cardoe
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2025
|
Noting that I do not have write permissions and so cannot merge this on my own :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that
meta-rustsupports Rust 1.86.0, it would be convenient forcargo-bitbaketo do the same. In particular, for it to be on a version ofcargowhereedition2024has been stabilized in order to work with such projects.0.89is one such version, and this PR merely bumps dependencies to there (not going further just to avoid getting ahead of the toolchain supported bymeta-rusteven thoughcargo-bitbakeitself of course does not need to be built with it).I did fairly minimal local testing, ensuring that with
cargo install --path .I was able to bitbake my projects including ones usingedition2024, but was likely not comprehensive.