WET-004: Sample Comcam Analysis for blended donuts #34
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
jbkalmbach
force-pushed
the
tickets/SITCOM-1145
branch
from
bd80faa to
8c834c4
Compare
jbkalmbach
changed the title
| @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As for WET-003, would be good to clarify that it's meant to be run in an USDF (RSP) environment.
Reply via ReviewNB
| @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would help to have here more explanation - are you comparing Zk estimation for these two blends against the average of that CCD? Or average of nine CCDs? Looking at the image I'm not sure.
Reply via ReviewNB
| @@ -0,0 +1,385 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A bit underwhelmed with the comparison. I'd honestly expect that the closer the blend, the worse the performance. Didn't we take ComCam data in fields with multiple blends per CCD? Please point to a relevant dayObs / seqNum and I can rerun these cells.
Reply via ReviewNB
No description provided.