-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
code-update-quality #21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR contains a TODO statement. Please check to see if they should be removed.
This PR affects one or more sensitive files and requires review from the security team. |
Please mark which AI tools you used for this PR by checking the appropriate boxes:
Tip: If you want to avoid this comment in the future, you can add a label of the format |
✨ PR ReviewGeneral FeedbackThis PR introduces logging improvements via printStackTrace() calls, adds timestamps to billing charges, and implements response history tracking. However, there are several issues: a typo in the charge payload field ("dats" instead of "date"), a missing space in the Authorization header token, and potentially insecure exception handling with full stacktraces. The code changes are relatively straightforward but introduce bugs that could cause integration failures between services. File:
File:
File:
Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream. |
🥷 Code experts: cghyzel, amitmohleji cghyzel, amitmohleji have most 👩💻 activity in the files. See details
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame: To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs |
✨ PR ReviewGeneral FeedbackThe PR includes several updates across multiple services. There are some good additions like error logging, timestamp tracking for charges, and expanded response data. However, there are multiple issues that need to be addressed: a typo in a field name ("dats" vs "date"), an authentication token formatting error, and excessive exception logging to stdout without proper handling. These issues could impact the communication between services and authentication functionality. File:
File:
File:
Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream. |
This PR is missing a Jira ticket reference in the title or description. |
Hello vlussenburg 👋 Thanks for making your first PR, and welcome to our project! |
🥷 Code experts: cghyzel, amitmohleji cghyzel, amitmohleji have most 👩💻 activity in the files. See details
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Activity based on git-commit:
Knowledge based on git-blame: To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs |
✨ PR Description
Purpose and impact:
This PR implements improvements to the order processing system, including error handling and timestamp tracking.
Main changes:
Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We’d love your feedback! 🚀