Improve performance on Linux with many network interfaces #60
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The existing implementation of
New()
has a performance issue on Linux for the case when there are a large number (~ thousands) of network interfaces on the system.Calling
Addrs()
on anet.Interface
triggers a netlink request (RTM_GETADDR
) that dumps addresses for all network interfaces, then filters the response messages to the ones matching the specified interface. Wheniface.Addrs()
is separately called on every item returned bynet.Interfaces()
, this results in O(n2) data being sent through netlink, and can cause significant performance issues on systems managing thousands of network interfaces (virtual TAP devices, in my case).Ideally a fix will eventually be implemented upstream (see discussion), but in the meantime, a workaround is to collect all network addresses through a single netlink call and assign the addresses to each network interface by index. I've created a simple drop-in module at github.com/wjordan/netinterfaces to help apply the fix with minimal diff to the existing codebase (see the implementation here).
I've included a simple benchmark test against the
New()
function, and compared the results before/after this PR on a single production host (with 1329 network interfaces):before (~8255 ms/op)
after (~141 ms/op)
-98.28%