Skip to content

Add CAPZ periodic job to run load test with 100 nodes #34191

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Add CAPZ periodic job to run load test with 100 nodes #34191

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

Jont828
Copy link
Contributor

@Jont828 Jont828 commented Jan 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

To be replaced with #33423

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 22, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jan 22, 2025
@Jont828 Jont828 force-pushed the capz-periodic-100-nodes branch from c4d4fd6 to 9a3943f Compare January 22, 2025 00:35
@Jont828 Jont828 force-pushed the capz-periodic-100-nodes branch from 9a3943f to a64c4f2 Compare January 22, 2025 00:51
jackfrancis
jackfrancis approved these changes Jan 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jackfrancis jackfrancis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 22, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis, Jont828

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b68149c into kubernetes:master Jan 22, 2025
7 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Jont828: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key cluster-api-provider-azure-periodics-main.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure/cluster-api-provider-azure-periodics-main.yaml

In response to this:

To be replaced with #33423

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jackfrancis jackfrancis jackfrancis approved these changes

@jsturtevant jsturtevant Awaiting requested review from jsturtevant

@marosset marosset Awaiting requested review from marosset

Assignees

@jackfrancis jackfrancis

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Jont828 @k8s-ci-robot @jackfrancis